Making a mistake isn’t the worst thing that you can do; failing to learn from the mistake is. We tend to notice and sometimes make a big deal of other people’s mistakes quite a lot. The fact is we all goof at one point or the other and some mistakes are definitely more costly than others. In the social media world, we have all come across goofs of massive proportions where people give away their real intentions and location while having called-in sick. Others get busted having less than honourable relationships by their spouses. The list is endless and I am sure most people have a story of a nasty error that we either made or by someone close to us.
The situation isn’t very different in the business environment; people make grave errors that do cost businesses money, customers and their reputation. Over the last four weeks I have observed as these type of situations played out on cyberspace. Here are two situations with crucial lessons for anyone using social media for business.
Situation 1: The unhappy Zuku customer
Zuku is Wananchi Online’s flagship brand providing triple-play services to the East African market. On their web site, they pride themselves as an “East African brand that aspires to bring our customer superior entertainment experience at an
affordable price”. From testimonials of a number of Zuku customers, at least their internet connectivity meets this description. The TV offering is an arguable point and I don’t know much about their voice service. On 2nd November 2011 one of their customers was not having a good day with Zuku and put up the tweet below.

The customer, @carolmusyoka used Twitter to get not only Zuku’s attention but that of other customers and potential customers to highlight the experience she was having dealing with the brand. In a short span of time, a number of other Zuku customers pitched in with their thoughts on Zuku’s customers service (or lack of it). From a safe distance it appears Zuku eventually made contact with their customer on phone but remained mum on Twitter where they actually have a presence @Zukufan. This was a major error on their part given the attention their brand was raising on Twitter, the sentiment of which was mostly negative. By 4th November, @carolmusyoka was still waiting for a solution and more Twitter users were weighing in with their thoughts and experiences. From the barrage of tweets, one user shared this link from another Zuku customer who was quite blunt about both their TV service and their “customer disservice” as he called it. The issue dragged on for a few days with the Twitter timeline with #Zuku references reading like a script from a horror-comedy screenplay. A week after this saga began the tweet below was put up.

Zuku decided to take leave instead of taking action and responsibility on the platform where their brand was suffering the most! Right there, they provided the latest case study in “how not to run your social media marketing”. They eventually reactivated their twitter account and have recently been on a following spree but questions still abound on whether they are using the channel better to keep their customers informed and happy. The @ZukuFan handle is protected, meaning that they screen those wishing to follow them and those who read their tweets. That feature wasn’t meant for any serious enterprise. Reminds me of a Bible story where some people were asked if they would light a lamp and keep it covered. If your business is on social media you are there to be seen and heard by as many people as will be available to listen.
Situation 2: The failed airline promotion
Australia’s largest airline and flag-carrier Qantas, is no stranger to social media. The airline has built a reputation over its 91 years of existence. On 22nd November 2011 the Qantas marketing team launched a Twitter campaign where the winning tweet would be rewarded with a Qantas first-class gift pack. The @QantasAirways account has over 68,000 followers and as such, running a campaign using this channel was bound to get some good conversation going. 
The background to this however is that the airline had been grappling with negative publicity following disputes with three unions that led to the eventual grounding of the airline’s fleet on 29th October 2011. Before fully resolving the customer dissatisfaction issue as a result of this, the company launched a campaign to try and engage it’s customers more on social media. With the hashtag #QantasLuxury, customers were to respond to this question: “Tell us ‘What is your dream luxury inflight experience?’ #QantasLuxury”
The good: Within an hour, the #QantasLuxury was trending across Australia. A social media expert, James Griffin of SR7 said there were on average 51 tweets per minute on the topic.
The Bad & the Ugly: Fresh from having thousands of disappointed customers following the grounding of the fleet, the tweets were not flattering and had nothing to do with the intended campaign. This became an ideal outlet for the airline’s customers to vent their frustrations. Here are a few of the tweets:
“#qantasluxury is chartering a Greyhound bus and arriving at your destination days before your grounded Qantas flight”
“#QantasLuxury- When the passengers arrive before the couriers delivering the lockout notices do”.
“Getting from A to B without the plane being grounded or an engine catching fire. #Qantasluxury”.
While there was nothing wrong with the campaign itself, what the airlines marketing team totally got wrong was the timing. They were insensitive to the issues many of their customers were still dealing with following the industrial disputes leading to the fleet grounding.
In March 2010, Nestle foods hit the news with one of the classic goofs that played out on Facebook following the actions of GreenPeace, an environmental lobby group. You can read more about it here.
While these examples may represent some extreme situations, making mistakes on social media doesn’t mean an end to a brands engagement online. If and when they do happen, the brand needs to ensure that it remains focussed on meeting customer expectations and directly addressing the issue. Diverting the attention of Fans and followers will only aggravate them. And obviously, so will deactivating your account or profile.
These types of mistakes can be avoided by having a clear strategy and policy for your business on how to run your affairs online. In the policy, there will be clear guidelines on a number of important issues such as:
- · who the authorised spokespeople are
- · the average lead-times to respond to customer queries
- · transition and handover procedures in case the site administrator changes roles or leaves the company
- · how to manage spammers and inappropriate content that external parties put on your social media channels
In the situation where you find yourself in a reactive situation, employ all reasonable principles that you would if the mistake had happened with a customer in your office, while remembering that there are hundreds or thousands of other customers watching closely. Here is another interesting perspective on how to proactively use social media especially for the airline industry for crisis management.
The bottom-line here is that social media will not fix other broken elements of the business. Every business will be challenged with some aspect or the other relating to their products or their customers but this shouldn’t also be an excuse not to engage in social media.
Social media marketing isn’t a band-aid for a broken business; it’s about using it to improve a business that has the basics right.